AI at Work
How to use AI at work
You're using AI for emails and social posts. The gap between that and what AI could do for the tasks that take the most time is where most organisations get stuck.
AI at Work
You're using AI for emails and social posts. The gap between that and what AI could do for the tasks that take the most time is where most organisations get stuck.
How an engagement runs
Discovery call
30 minutes, no commitment
Scoping workshop
One structured day on your real processes
Written findings
Report, priorities and a clear order of action
Delivery
Fixed price, defined deliverables, governance built in
Handover
Documentation your team can run without us
Ready to talk?
30-minute call. No obligation.
DSIT research published in January 2026 found 71% of UK organisations cannot identify an AI use case relevant to their work, even when they are already using AI tools. The barrier is not knowledge. It is time. Most organisations are too busy running the existing workflow to step back and redesign it from within.
For most teams, AI has settled into a narrow routine. Emails get drafted faster. Social posts come together more quickly. Then the screen closes and everyone returns to the same manual processes: compiling weekly reports from three separate spreadsheets, turning planning consultation responses into structured officer summaries, processing thirty inbound supplier quotes into a format anyone can compare.
Those tasks stay untouched. Not because AI cannot help with them, but because working out whether it can, and what it would cost to commission a solution, takes time and expertise that most leadership teams do not have spare.
An AI at Work session does that assessment for you. If you want an indicative business case before commissioning it, the free AI Value Navigator baselines your busiest workflows in about seven minutes.
For charities, the numbers tell the same story. The Charity Digital Skills Report 2025 found 76% of charities are using AI tools, but only 2% are doing so in any way that connects to strategy or saves meaningful time. Staff are experimenting without governance, without oversight, and without any link to the organisation's most demanding work.
An AI at Work session is a structured discovery and scoping engagement priced at £1,500 + VAT. We sit with your teams and work through the tasks that consume the most time in your organisation. Each task goes through a three-pathway assessment. Every recommendation passes through a governance gate before it reaches the written report.
There is no template agenda. The session starts from your actual workflows, in your own words.
Where a task involves producing, drafting, reviewing, or processing text and content, the session assesses whether a well-engineered prompt or a configured AI assistant is the right approach. A configured AI assistant is a purpose-built tool set up within a platform such as ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, or Gemini, given specific instructions to handle a defined job consistently.
The assessment covers what the prompt or assistant would need to do, what data or context it draws on, what format the output should take, and what human review the output requires before it is acted on. The post-session report contains a scoped prompt brief and a fixed-scope quote.
In practice
A North West service business with around 20 staff brought one recurring task to a session: drafting client-facing progress reports from internal project notes. The same structure was needed every time, covering milestones reached, work outstanding, and next steps, but each report was being written from scratch. It was taking three to four hours per week across the team.
The session assessed this as a Pathway One task. A configured AI assistant scoped to the firm's report structure and approved terminology, working from the project notes each account manager already kept, would handle the drafting. The post-session report contained a prompt brief built around the firm's own template and a fixed-scope quote for setup and testing.
Where a task involves moving data between systems, triggering actions based on set conditions, or compiling information from multiple sources on a schedule, the session assesses the workflow, the systems involved, the trigger logic, and what human review the automated output requires before being acted on.
The session scopes the automation and documents the governance requirements. The post-session report contains a workflow scope and a fixed-scope quote.
Pathway Two tends to produce the clearest time savings. Public sector teams generating officer summaries from planning consultation responses, and SME operations teams processing inbound supplier quotes into a consistent comparison format for procurement decisions, are both tasks that route through this pathway. The automation is not built during the session. The session produces the scope and the quote. The build is commissioned separately from the report.
Pathway Two tasks are delivered through the AI Automation service.
Some tasks do not fit anything available off the shelf. The session assesses what the requirement involves, which systems it needs to integrate with, and what the build approach would be. This pathway produces a development brief and a fixed-scope quote in the post-session report.
For organisations that want to see what a solution looks like before committing to a full build, we offer a Try before you build service. We take the problem from the development brief, build a working version, and let you see the solution before approving the full project. If you go ahead, the cost is deducted from the final price.
Bespoke builds are scoped and delivered through the AI Software Development service. Nothing is commissioned until the client reviews the report and decides to proceed.
Before any recommendation is made, each task is assessed for data risk. The assessment covers the data involved, the UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) basis for processing it, the human oversight requirement at each stage, and the escalation procedure if something goes wrong. Tasks that cannot proceed safely are documented with the reasoning. That record is part of the report.
This assessment runs as a gate throughout the session, not as a sign-off appended to recommendations already made. If a task involves personal data, beneficiary records, sensitive operational information, or any data that creates regulatory or ethical risk for the organisation, that surfaces during the assessment itself.
The resulting documentation is task-specific. It names the actual data sources involved, the lawful basis for processing under UK GDPR, the human review step required before the output is used, and what the procedure is if an automated source fails or produces unexpected output. A board, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), or a funder looking at how the organisation approached AI adoption can see exactly what decisions were made and why.
Where the session surfaces that no organisation-wide AI policy exists, that is documented as a finding. Addressing it sits within the AI Ethics and Governance service. The task-level governance documentation in the session report is not a substitute for an AI policy. The report makes that distinction clearly, and links to what an appropriate next step looks like.
Each session focuses on three to five tasks. That is the range that allows us to assess each one properly, document the governance considerations, and produce a fixed-scope quote you can act on. Clients who arrive with a longer list are encouraged to prioritise beforehand. The preparation question in the FAQ below covers how to do that.
After the session, we produce a written report covering every task assessed: the pathway recommendation for each, the governance documentation specific to each workflow, and fixed-scope quotes for the recommended work.
Every element is written to stand on its own. Pathway reasoning, data risk assessment, human oversight requirement, and a fixed price for the work: all in a format that goes directly to a leadership team, board, or trustees without requiring further translation.
Builds are commissioned separately, after the report, and only if you decide to proceed.
Your task
Writing reports, emails, templates, or content
What the report contains
A scoped prompt brief and fixed-scope quote
Clearest time savings
Your task
Moving data between systems or compiling from multiple sources
What the report contains
A workflow scope and fixed-scope quote
Your task
Something specific to your organisation that no existing tool handles
What the report contains
A development brief and fixed-scope quote
| Right for you if | Not right for you if |
|---|---|
| You are already using AI but only for basic tasks | You have not yet decided whether to adopt AI |
| You want specific, costed recommendations for your actual workflows | You need an organisation-wide AI strategy first |
| Your team spends hours on tasks that feel automatable | You need staff training before exploring implementation |
| You need governance documentation for any AI use you commission | You are looking for a general AI awareness session with no outputs |
| You want to know what to build before committing to a larger investment | You need a same-day working build without a scoping stage |
If a broader pattern of AI adoption opportunities surfaces during the session, the natural next step is AI Strategy. The report will flag this where it is relevant.
75% of UK organisations that have adopted AI report improved workforce productivity (DSIT, January 2026). The session identifies which specific tasks in your organisation are most likely to produce that result, and what it would cost to commission the work.
Artificial intelligence's defining characteristic is adaptability through learning from data rather than following fixed, pre-programmed rules.
Read moreBritain’s NHS faces 7.8 million people on waiting lists. Traditional solutions like hiring more doctors take years to implement.
Read moreArtificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries, and the charity sector is no exception. Charities today face mounting challenges, including funding constraints, administrative burdens, and effective donor engagement.
Read more